some people get bent when I talk about my "forecasts" as opinions and not absolutes
but I am not able to speak in absolutes; nor, in my opinion, is anyone else
I have my "ways" of seeing, my intellectual style in taking impulses and extrapolating a likely path
I realize some would perhaps prefer me to be "all knowing" but I am not
that doesn't mean I don't have unique means for formulating probability models about the future
nor does it suggest that there isn't some "extra sensory something" going on in how I go about it
because there is
but ESP is not enough and "extra" is not the same thing as total
no psychic is 98% accurate
we must interpret what we see and in that interpretation, it is easy to veer off course
I do believe there is value in "forecasting" as I do
but I think it's important to recognize I am as much Sherlock Holmes as Nostradamus . . . and, in my opinion, saying this doesn't "invalidate" me as a "psychic"
I think it is closer to the "truth" about what we do and how we do it
but I am not able to speak in absolutes; nor, in my opinion, is anyone else
I have my "ways" of seeing, my intellectual style in taking impulses and extrapolating a likely path
I realize some would perhaps prefer me to be "all knowing" but I am not
that doesn't mean I don't have unique means for formulating probability models about the future
nor does it suggest that there isn't some "extra sensory something" going on in how I go about it
because there is
but ESP is not enough and "extra" is not the same thing as total
no psychic is 98% accurate
we must interpret what we see and in that interpretation, it is easy to veer off course
I do believe there is value in "forecasting" as I do
but I think it's important to recognize I am as much Sherlock Holmes as Nostradamus . . . and, in my opinion, saying this doesn't "invalidate" me as a "psychic"
I think it is closer to the "truth" about what we do and how we do it
RSS Feed