many past life #researchers take a dim view of psychics . . . their desire to apply rigorous methodological controls to their investigation is admirable
yet to discount non-traditional means of "data retrieval" -- like #clairvoyance(when there is no defined data source from which to draw information in the first place) . . . seems (to me) incredibly short-sighted
suggesting (for example) that birth marks (perhaps reflective or a prior life wound) are #scientific and biometric analysis of photos is not
seems incredibly close-minded and not all that scientific -- at least to me, as there are no controlled experiments one might use to test this hypothesis
I persist in my theory that biometric commonalities will be present in all "valid" past life matches
yet to discount non-traditional means of "data retrieval" -- like #clairvoyance(when there is no defined data source from which to draw information in the first place) . . . seems (to me) incredibly short-sighted
suggesting (for example) that birth marks (perhaps reflective or a prior life wound) are #scientific and biometric analysis of photos is not
seems incredibly close-minded and not all that scientific -- at least to me, as there are no controlled experiments one might use to test this hypothesis
I persist in my theory that biometric commonalities will be present in all "valid" past life matches
RSS Feed